I posted earlier this month about an issue that I ran into concerning a surviving spouse’s ability to recover the full outstanding amount of joint debts from the decedent spouse’s estate. I hadn’t done the required reading when I posted that, but I have now.
As I suspected, the caselaw is pretty clear that the estate is liable for contribution, but none of the cases the attorney for the surviving spouse is banking on goes beyond 50%.
Now, the real question is whether it’s worth it in my case to fight about. And if it’s not, can I convince my client of that fact?
Posted by esittig
Posted by esittig